| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cenargen.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
27/02/2008 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
16/05/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
ANTUNES, A. F.; GROSSI DE SÁ, F.; JIMENEZ, A. V.; ROCHA, T. L.; PAULA, J. E. de; ESPINDOLA, L. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
ALINE FERNANDA ANTUNES, UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA; MARIA FÁTIMA GROSSI DE SA, EMBRAPA RECURSOS GENÉTICOS E BIOTECNOLOGIA; ARNUBIO VALENCIA JIMÉNEZ; THALES LIMA ROCHA, EMBRAPA RECURSOS GENÉTICOS E BIOTECNOLOGIA; JOSÉ ELIAS DE PAULA, UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA; LAILA SAMEN ESPINDOLA, UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA. |
|
Título: |
Investigação de extratos vegetais do Cerrado sobre insetos-praga de feijão. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2007 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Jornal Brasileiro de Fitomedicina, v. 5, n. 1-2, p. 5, 2007. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Notas: |
Edição dos resumos do VI Simpósio Brasileiro de Farmacognosia, Belém, PA, set. 2007. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Acantoscelides. |
|
Thesagro: |
Amilase; Feijão; Inseticida. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Zabrotes. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00742nam a2200229 a 4500
001 1188863
005 2024-05-16
008 2007 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aANTUNES, A. F.
245 $aInvestigação de extratos vegetais do Cerrado sobre insetos-praga de feijão.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aJornal Brasileiro de Fitomedicina, v. 5, n. 1-2, p. 5$c2007
500 $aEdição dos resumos do VI Simpósio Brasileiro de Farmacognosia, Belém, PA, set. 2007.
650 $aZabrotes
650 $aAmilase
650 $aFeijão
650 $aInseticida
653 $aAcantoscelides
700 1 $aGROSSI DE SÁ, F.
700 1 $aJIMENEZ, A. V.
700 1 $aROCHA, T. L.
700 1 $aPAULA, J. E. de
700 1 $aESPINDOLA, L. S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia (CENARGEN) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
|
Data corrente: |
03/01/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/04/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 5 |
|
Autoria: |
AHMED, S.; ROBERTO, S. R.; DOMINGUES, A. R.; SHAHAB, M.; CHAVES JUNIOR, O. J.; SUMIDA, C. H.; SOUZA, R. T. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
Saeed Ahmed, Agricultural Research Center, Londrina State University, Celso Garcia Cid Road, km 380, P.O. Box 10.011, Londrina ZIP 86057-970, Brazil; Sergio Ruffo Roberto, Agricultural Research Center, Londrina State University, Celso Garcia Cid Road, km 380, P.O. Box 10.011, Londrina ZIP 86057-970, Brazil; Allan Ricardo Domingues, Agricultural Research Center, Londrina State University, Celso Garcia Cid Road, km 380, P.O. Box 10.011, Londrina ZIP 86057-970, Brazil; Muhammad Shahab, Agricultural Research Center, Londrina State University, Celso Garcia Cid Road, km 380, P.O. Box 10.011, Londrina ZIP 86057-970, Brazil; Osmar José Chaves Junior, Agricultural Research Center, Londrina State University, Celso Garcia Cid Road, km 380, P.O. Box 10.011, Londrina ZIP 86057-970, Brazil; Ciro Hideki Sumida, Agricultural Research Center, Londrina State University, Celso Garcia Cid Road, km 380, P.O. Box 10.011, Londrina ZIP 86057-970, Brazil; REGINALDO TEODORO DE SOUZA, CNPUV. |
|
Título: |
Effects of different sulfur dioxide pads on botrytis mold in 'Italia' table grapes under cold storage. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Horticulturae, v. 4, n. 4, p. 1-11, Sep. 2018. |
|
DOI: |
10.3390/horticulturae4040029 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
"Italia" grape is one of the most important table grape cultivars grown worldwide. Gray mold, caused by Botrytis cinerea Pers. Fr., is one of the most important causes of postharvest decay of table grapes, and the control of this disease is very difficult because postharvest treatments with synthetic fungicides are not allowed in many countries. The objective of this study was to compare different types of pads releasing different doses of SO2 during cold storage to control gray mold in "Italia" table grapes grown under subtropical conditions. Grape bunches were harvested from a commercial field trained on an overhead trellis located at Cambira, state of Parana (PR), South Brazil. The grapes were packed into carton boxes (capacity, 4.5 kg) and subjected to the following SO2 pad treatments (Uvasys®, Cape Town, South Africa) under cold storage (1.0 ± 1 °C) for 50 days: (i) Control; (ii) SO2 slow release pad; (iii) SO2 dual release pad; (iv) SO2 dual release? fast reduced pad; (v) SO2 slow release pad with grapes inoculated with B. cinerea suspension; (vi) SO2 dual release pad with grapes inoculated with B. cinerea suspension; and (vii) SO2 dual release-fast reduced pad with grapes inoculated with B. cinerea suspension. After cold storage, the grape boxes were maintained for 7 days at room temperature (25 °C). The incidence of gray mold on the grapes, firmness, shattered berries, stem browning, as well as other physicochemical variables, such as bunch mass, bunch mass loss, skin color, soluble solids (SS), titratable acidity (TA) and SS/TA were evaluated. Both SO2 dual release pads were highly efficient in preventing the incidence of gray mold in ?Italia? grapes packed in clamshells during the 50-day period of cold storage and at room temperature, even with Botrytis-inoculated berries. The SO2 slow release pad showed lower efficiency, but was higher than the control. The SO2 dual release pad treatments provided the best results with respect to stem browning scores (fresh and green stems) during cold storage, and no differences were observed among the treatments with respect to the other physicochemical evaluations. Keywords: Vitis vinifera (L.); sulfur dioxide pads; postharvest decay; table grape quality attributes Menos"Italia" grape is one of the most important table grape cultivars grown worldwide. Gray mold, caused by Botrytis cinerea Pers. Fr., is one of the most important causes of postharvest decay of table grapes, and the control of this disease is very difficult because postharvest treatments with synthetic fungicides are not allowed in many countries. The objective of this study was to compare different types of pads releasing different doses of SO2 during cold storage to control gray mold in "Italia" table grapes grown under subtropical conditions. Grape bunches were harvested from a commercial field trained on an overhead trellis located at Cambira, state of Parana (PR), South Brazil. The grapes were packed into carton boxes (capacity, 4.5 kg) and subjected to the following SO2 pad treatments (Uvasys®, Cape Town, South Africa) under cold storage (1.0 ± 1 °C) for 50 days: (i) Control; (ii) SO2 slow release pad; (iii) SO2 dual release pad; (iv) SO2 dual release? fast reduced pad; (v) SO2 slow release pad with grapes inoculated with B. cinerea suspension; (vi) SO2 dual release pad with grapes inoculated with B. cinerea suspension; and (vii) SO2 dual release-fast reduced pad with grapes inoculated with B. cinerea suspension. After cold storage, the grape boxes were maintained for 7 days at room temperature (25 °C). The incidence of gray mold on the grapes, firmness, shattered berries, stem browning, as well as other physicochemical variables, such as bunch mass, bunch mass loss, ski... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Postharvest decay; Sulfur dioxide pads; Table grape quality attributes. |
|
Thesagro: |
Vitis Vinifera. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Table grapes. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/189738/1/Effects-of-Different-Sulfur-Dioxide-Pad...talia-Table-Grapes-under-Cold-Storage.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03063naa a2200265 a 4500
001 2102994
005 2019-04-27
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.3390/horticulturae4040029$2DOI
100 1 $aAHMED, S.
245 $aEffects of different sulfur dioxide pads on botrytis mold in 'Italia' table grapes under cold storage.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $a"Italia" grape is one of the most important table grape cultivars grown worldwide. Gray mold, caused by Botrytis cinerea Pers. Fr., is one of the most important causes of postharvest decay of table grapes, and the control of this disease is very difficult because postharvest treatments with synthetic fungicides are not allowed in many countries. The objective of this study was to compare different types of pads releasing different doses of SO2 during cold storage to control gray mold in "Italia" table grapes grown under subtropical conditions. Grape bunches were harvested from a commercial field trained on an overhead trellis located at Cambira, state of Parana (PR), South Brazil. The grapes were packed into carton boxes (capacity, 4.5 kg) and subjected to the following SO2 pad treatments (Uvasys®, Cape Town, South Africa) under cold storage (1.0 ± 1 °C) for 50 days: (i) Control; (ii) SO2 slow release pad; (iii) SO2 dual release pad; (iv) SO2 dual release? fast reduced pad; (v) SO2 slow release pad with grapes inoculated with B. cinerea suspension; (vi) SO2 dual release pad with grapes inoculated with B. cinerea suspension; and (vii) SO2 dual release-fast reduced pad with grapes inoculated with B. cinerea suspension. After cold storage, the grape boxes were maintained for 7 days at room temperature (25 °C). The incidence of gray mold on the grapes, firmness, shattered berries, stem browning, as well as other physicochemical variables, such as bunch mass, bunch mass loss, skin color, soluble solids (SS), titratable acidity (TA) and SS/TA were evaluated. Both SO2 dual release pads were highly efficient in preventing the incidence of gray mold in ?Italia? grapes packed in clamshells during the 50-day period of cold storage and at room temperature, even with Botrytis-inoculated berries. The SO2 slow release pad showed lower efficiency, but was higher than the control. The SO2 dual release pad treatments provided the best results with respect to stem browning scores (fresh and green stems) during cold storage, and no differences were observed among the treatments with respect to the other physicochemical evaluations. Keywords: Vitis vinifera (L.); sulfur dioxide pads; postharvest decay; table grape quality attributes
650 $aTable grapes
650 $aVitis Vinifera
653 $aPostharvest decay
653 $aSulfur dioxide pads
653 $aTable grape quality attributes
700 1 $aROBERTO, S. R.
700 1 $aDOMINGUES, A. R.
700 1 $aSHAHAB, M.
700 1 $aCHAVES JUNIOR, O. J.
700 1 $aSUMIDA, C. H.
700 1 $aSOUZA, R. T. de
773 $tHorticulturae$gv. 4, n. 4, p. 1-11, Sep. 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho (CNPUV) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Catálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Algodão; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Pantanal; Embrapa Rondônia; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Trigo; Embrapa Uva e Vinho. MenosCatálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Algodão; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Pantanal; Embrapa Rondônia... Mostrar Todas |
|
Identificador: |
2826 |
|
Data corrente: |
09/05/2002 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/05/2002 |
|
Código do título: |
0900592 |
|
ISSN: |
0100-6967 |
|
Código CCN: |
027582-4 |
|
Título e Subtítulo: |
DIVULGACAO AGRONOMICA |
|
Entidade: |
Shell Quimica S.A. |
|
Local de publicação: |
Sao Paulo-SP |
|
Periodicidade: |
irregular |
|
Inicio de publicação: |
1959 |
|
Coleções da unidade: |
Embrapa Algodão
1961/79 (3,5-9,11,13,14-19,21-46)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Amapá
1966 (22); 1969 (27); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1975 (36); 1976 (39-41); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (46)
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental
1959 (1); 1960 (2); 1961 (3-4); 1962 (5-8); 1963 (10); 1964 (11-13); 1965 (14-17); 1966 (18-22); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (38-41); 1977 (42); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (45-46); 1980 (47)
Classificação: 632.05D518
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão
1960 (1); 1962 (6); 1963 (10); 1964 (12-13,15); 1965 (16-17); 1966 (19,22); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (38-40); 1977 (42); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (45)
Embrapa Cerrados
1959-60 (1-2); 1961 (4); 1962 (6); 1964 (11); 1965; 1966 (18-22); 1968 (24,26); 1969 (27); 1970-80 (28-47)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura
1960(1-2); 1961(3-4); 1962(5-8); 1963(9-10); 1964(11-13); 1965(14-17); 1966(18-22); 1967(23); 1968(24-26); 1969(27); 1970(28-29); 1971(30-31); 1972(32); 1973(33); 1974(34-35); 1975(36-37); 1976(38-41); 1977(42); 1978(43-44); 1979(45-46); 1980(47);
Embrapa Meio-Norte
1961 (4); 1964 (12); 1965 (14-17); 1966 (18-21); 1967 (23); 1968/78 (25-44); 1979 (45)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Pantanal
1971-80 (30,33,38-40,42-47)
Classificação: 23A
Embrapa Rondônia
1967 (23); 1969-71 (27-30); 1973-74 33-35; 1976 (39); 1978 (43-44); 1979-80 (45-47);
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Semiárido
1960 (2); 1961 (1,3); 1962 (7-8); 1965 (14-16); 1966 (20); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (39-41); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (45-46); 1980 (47);
Embrapa Soja
1965 (17); 1966(20); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (38-41); 1977 (42); 1978(43-44); 1979 (46); 1980 (47)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Trigo
1960/80 (1-2) 1960; (3-4) 1961; (5-8) 1962; (9-10) 1963; (11-13) 1964; (15-16) 1965; (18-22) 1966; (23) 1967; (24-26) 1968; (27) 1969; (28-29) 1970; (30-31) 1971; (32) 1972; (33) 1973; (34-35) 1974; (36-37) 1975; (38-41) 1976; (42) 1977; (43-44) 1978; (45-46) 1979; (47) 1980.
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Uva e Vinho
1961 (1); 1962 (8); 1963 (10); 1964 (11-13); 1965 (14-17); 1966 (18-22); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34); 1975 (35-37); 1976 (38-41); 1977 (42); 1978 (44); 1979 (45-46); 1980 (47)
Classificação: 632.05 |
|
Fechar
|
|
|
